keryell added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53705#1278066, @rjmccall wrote:
> I don't suppose there's any chance you can just tell Khronos to fix their > stuff. It's a little funny to be more conservative about keywords in C++ > when the C++ committee is actually much more aggressive about adding keywords > in the non-reserved space than C is. You are actually telling this to Khronos since a lot of Khronos members are on the LLVM mailing lists and are reading this right now... :-) I am unsure to understand what you mean about "the C++ committee is actually much more aggressive about adding keywords in the non-reserved space than C is". The motivation behind this was to have 0 language extension to C++ in OpenCL C++, like with the single-source version of the standard, SYCL, where you can have a program which is executed purely on CPU without any compiler support, to avoid the CUDA & C++AMP atrocities. That seems like a good discussion topic next Thursday at the LLVM Bay Area Meetup. :-) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53705 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
