ztamas added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53974#1283833, @sberg wrote:
> > I run the new checker on LibreOffice project. I found ~25 false positives, > > which seems small enough to me. This false positives can be supressed > > easily. > > Do you have a link to such a false positive and how it got suppressed in the > LibreOffice code base? (If those are included in the referenced > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=26ccd00bc96c585b7065af0dcce246b5bfaae5e1, > I failed to spot them.) I uploaded here the output of the new checker on LibreOffice after my referenced commit: https://gist.github.com/tzolnai/9c2c78323c098e2e09d63c1a1384274b Search for bugprone-too-small-loop-variable in the log. Not all are false positives. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D53974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
