ztamas added a comment. Just to make it clear. I think this check is in a good shape now. I mean it catches usefull issues and also does not produce too many false positives, as I see. So my intention here is to get it in as it is now (of course after I fixed things reviewers find) and later it can be improved in separate patches (e.g. reduce false positives even more, handle other use cases like while loop etc.). I think it would be better to have smaller patches than polishing this big one until it gets ~prefect. In the test file I added some TODO comments. They were added as a documentation of future possibilities.
Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D53974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
