gamesh411 added a comment. In D59934#1449221 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59934#1449221>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Hmm. Is your clang recent enough to contain @bruntib's patch D57892 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57892>? Is it possible that this patch solves the > same issue? With this patch applied, are you able to get a macro expansions > from a different TU in the plist output, or does this patch only resolve the > regression? This happens even with D57892 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57892> applied. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59934/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59934 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
