plotfi added a comment. In D60974#1483210 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974#1483210>, @jakehehrlich wrote:
> In D60974#1483164 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974#1483164>, @plotfi wrote: > > > So, @compnerd and I have discussed and we'd like to propose a yaml schema > > that can express what we need for ifsos for the Sections and the Symbols. > > > > ... > > > Can you clarify is this is for the fully merged format or for the unmerged > format? I *really* strongly believe that the fully merged format should go > though llvm-elfabi. Unmerged. The merged format could be elfabi or raw elf, but I want to agree on something that just lets us generate the intermediate unmerged artifacts for now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
