jfb added a comment. In D63423#1550725 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63423#1550725>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> I've always been frustrated at how clang just gives up as soon as it sees a > macro. > At best that should be controlled with some command-line flag. This patch is not the place to change common clang behavior. I'm advocating for what we usually do: be conservative in macros because token-pasting tends to look "wrong" but not actually be wrong as much (i.e. false positives). If you want clang to do something different, an RFC to cfe-dev is the right place for such a discussion. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63423/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63423 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
