MaskRay added a comment.
I still have the feeling that such configurations should be added to
clangDriver/gcc specs or a shell script wrapper of lld.
How do you decide to handle "Handling of indirect shared library dependencies"?
It does not seem to be favored by lld contributors.
================
Comment at: lld/tools/nb.lld/nb.lld.cpp:94
+
+ // disable superfluous RUNPATH on NetBSD
+ args.push_back("--disable-new-dtags");
----------------
You can't use DT_RUNPATH probably because the change `Add support for
DT_RUNPATH - it is just the same as we always have treated DT_RPATH. Approved
by core.` (2018-12-30) is still considered new. If you do this in clangDriver,
you need a comment with a TODO about the migration process.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69755/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69755
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
