krytarowski added a comment. In D69755#1731394 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69755#1731394>, @MaskRay wrote:
> I still have the feeling that such configurations should be added to > clangDriver/gcc specs or a shell script wrapper of lld. OK, as you allow now a shell wrapper of lld, this is a progress. nb.lld is a C++ wrapper on steroids doing the right job and part of the upstream repo (this is required). We do not allow downstream LLVM/Clang/... patches in our basesystem and keeping this code upstream is required. Also from maintenance burden as LLVM APIs evolve quickly. > How do you decide to handle "Handling of indirect shared library > dependencies"? It does not seem to be favored by lld contributors. The modern Linux/GNU behavior is rejected in NetBSD and we keep the traditional behavior that is considered by our community as desired. This is another topic and indeed probably our next major target to get to work within LLD. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69755/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69755 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
