MyDeveloperDay marked 2 inline comments as done.
MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/Format.cpp:768
   LLVMStyle.CommentPragmas = "^ IWYU pragma:";
+  LLVMStyle.ConstStyle = FormatStyle::CS_Leave;
   LLVMStyle.CompactNamespaces = false;
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > lebedev.ri wrote:
> > > Based on code reviews, this should be `CS_West`.
> > I would tend to agree for the LLVM project itself, but I really don't feel 
> > I can change this due to the huge number of projects which have 
> > BasedOnStyle: LLVM  (not to mention most other style inherit from LLVM like 
> > Google, Chromium etc...)
> > 
> > I think this needs to be an opt-in change in the .clang-format (at least 
> > for now)
> There is already a number of stylistic LLVM-specific decisions in LLVM style
> * 80-col wrap
> * pointer alignment to the right
> * spaces instead of tabs
> * ???
> I think it first and foremost is an LLVM style, and i don't
> really recall any guarantees that it must not/will not change.
Again I do agree, but I think those rules were established before clang-format 
really gained such popular usage, those coming to clang-format changed those 
probably straight away if they didn't agree with their established their style.

Changing something under everyone now feels like I'd have a different agenda 
(for west const to win), and that that is not my goal. I'm simply trying to 
facilitate compliance.

I think we can agree the east/west const rebellion is a contentious issue, (as 
where the previous formatting wars!), my aim here is to help try and remove the 
discussion from the debate and let people move on! but I think what it doesn't 
need is someone like clang-format being considered the bad guy by dictating a 
default style globally.

I did a quick search on github, the hits to "const int" and "int const" alone 
are too eye-watering. I really don't want to break the internet with this.



CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to