probinson added a comment. In D69822#1733269 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69822#1733269>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D69822#1733262 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69822#1733262>, @probinson wrote: > > > The maze of twisty -g passages gets a new secret door. Oh well. > > > If you find this to be a significant complication, I'd really like to discuss > it further - I know there are some twisty things (one of the worst I created > when it comes to -fsplit-dwarf-inlining, -gsplit-dwarf, -gmlt combinations) - > but this seems pretty simple/tidy/orthogonal to me. No, no, if we can at least keep the twistiness in one place (or two I suppose, one for C/C++ and one for asm) it's not a real problem. Maybe a strategic helper function could be useful to make those two places more obviously the same. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69822/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69822 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
