ABataev added a comment. In D69853#1734760 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853#1734760>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D69853#1734620 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853#1734620>, @ABataev wrote: > > > Again, better to split into 2 patches, one for LLVM and one for clang. > > > I split the other patch, but this one cannot be split in a reasonable > (=testable) manner. Splitting a patch only to have smaller diffs is not the > goal. We don't need to test it. Just split it into 2 parts, llvm and clang, nothing else. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
