sylvestre.ledru added a comment. > I may have missed this in prior discussions, and if so, I'm sorry -- but why > are we taking CodeChecker as the model for this?
I went ahead and use it because: - it is there and maintained (I contributed to the list a few time) - it is pretty good from my experience (it is rare that I see the list of checker/severity and disagree with the evaluation) - it is a good start to trigger some discussions - codechecker upstream is also involved in clang-tidy Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71963/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71963 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
