xazax.hun added a comment.

In D72982#1831595 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982#1831595>, @hans wrote:

> Wait, do we really want the "(in-process)" marker to be written to a separate 
> line? I'm not sure that we do.


Since the `-###` command had this property of emitting copy pastable `-cc1` 
invocations I would be surprised if `scan-build` would be the only tool/script 
to rely on this. Whatever fix we come up with I think it would be great to 
maintain this property.

> The change description doesn't explain how scan-build was broken or how this 
> fixes it.
> 
> And, maybe most importantly, it seems scan-build doesn't have any tests that 
> catches this? Should it have one?

The fact that scan-build does not have a lit-test that broke by this change is 
definitely a bug and we should definitely fix this. Unfortunately, no one had 
time to do so yet.

> 
> 
> In D72982#1831138 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982#1831138>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> 
>> Do you have commit access or need someone to commit on your behalf? Also, in 
>> case your change made it into the clang 10 release branch this will need to 
>> be cherry picked there as well.
> 
> 
> I've put it on my clang 10 todo list, but I'm also not sure this is the right 
> fix, see above.

Thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to