xazax.hun added a comment. In D72982#1832029 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982#1832029>, @aganea wrote:
> In D72982#1832000 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982#1832000>, @xazax.hun wrote: > > > Thanks! Alternatively we could try to push the changes to all three > > versions and revert this patch once all of them are accepted and a new pip > > package is published. > > > @xazax.hun In that case do you think it'd be possible for scan-build to > handle a more structured format like a CDB? (and inherently make clang emit > that) In case you refer to compilation database, scan-build-py already does handle that. The cc1 command line is used to avoid duplicating driver logic in scan-build. So sometimes, when scan-build want to peak the cc1 commands it will get it using `-###` instead of trying to infer them from the (driver) command that is available in the compilation database. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72982 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
