NoQ added a comment. In D77229#2004964 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229#2004964>, @baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> Even if I put weeks or months of work into it the code will be worse at the > end because there will be lots of branches upon the nature of the variable > and alternative ways for reaching the `Decl` from their regions. What specifically do you want from the `Decl`? Is it the type? We have it. Is it the very fact that it's a parameter? We have it. Is it the index of the parameter? We have it. Is it the name of the parameter? It's so irrelevant that it's not even necessarily consistent across redeclarations, but if you really need it you may try to obtain the `Decl` whenever it's available, as the amount of cases when the `Decl` is available hasn't changed. What else does a `Decl` have to offer? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
