vsk accepted this revision.
vsk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This lgtm.
IMO we'd get the same coverage if the C file contained `void foo() {}`, but
that's just a nit :). It'd be good to follow up with David about what he thinks
is lacking in `general.proftext`, but that's for a later commit.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18289
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
