ldionne added a comment. In D31413#2279182 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D31413#2279182>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Yes, and the way I would handle this is to change the `init_priority` value > checking to allow values <= 100 if the attribute location is within a system > header. This would allow libc++ to use the reserved priority but would still > give errors when attempted from user code. Ok, that makes sense. If Clang implements that change, I can go back and change it in libc++. I unfortunately don't have bandwidth to go and do that, since this isn't affecting a platform I directly work on. So if anyone's willing to go and change Clang to make that work, ping me here and I'll fix libc++. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D31413/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D31413 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits