svenvh added a comment. In D97869#2602943 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97869#2602943>, @Anastasia wrote:
> I was just thinking if we could combine the calls into one function to > minimize the number of lines to parse? Perhaps this will make the Tablegen > generator too complex? That will increase the emitter's complexity. Especially when taking into account the next point about handling optional functionality. Hard to say in advance if paying for the added emitter complexity is worth the parsing time reduction, though the parsing time reduction is probably not going to be an order of magnitude difference. > Also would it be possible to handle optional functionality - extensions and > functions available in certain versions? Yes, I think this should be possible; I already have a TODO in the emitter. It will make the resulting file bigger of course, because parts will have to be guarded with #ifdefs. But I believe it would be a good way to test extension and version handling for builtins. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97869/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97869 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
