MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
> And also another different in that case (without lambda):
>
> ASSERT_NO_THROW(
> {
> iterator += 507408;
> });
>
> is now format like this:
>
> ASSERT_NO_THROW({ iterator += 507408; });
I think this shows where your change made an assumption that this was a lambda,
but its not necessarily is as there is no TT_LamdbaLBrace, I would argue your
change was the regression even if looks nicer (in your view)
AnnotatedTokens(L=0):
M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=1 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=0 Name=identifier L=15 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0xad8a50 Text='ASSERT_NO_THROW'
M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=1 BK=0 P=23 Name=l_paren L=16 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='('
M=0 C=1 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=1 P=140 Name=l_brace L=17 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='{'
M=0 C=1 T=Unknown S=1 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=61 Name=r_brace L=39 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='}'
M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=43 Name=r_paren L=40 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text=')'
M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=23 Name=semi L=41 PPK=2 FakeLParens=
FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text=';'
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
