aaron.ballman added a comment. In D69764#2873225 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2873225>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> If this is something we think we wouldn't want in clang-format, what about > the idea of building a new binary which did allow the modification of the > tokens, This comes up from time to time and I kind of feel its a weak > argument for those that don't want to use it enforcing their will on those > that do. > > I feel we have D69764: [clang-format] Add East/West Const fixer capability > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764> and D95168: [clang-format] Add InsertBraces > option <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168> both of which seem to break the > fundamental belief that some feel that we shouldn't change anything other > than whitespace (A fact that has already been broken 3 times already). > > But really these are just separate passes, so why couldn't clang-format allow > custom passes to be added much like any compiler does. > > If the objection is that this isn't clang-format's role then what if we build > something new whose purpose IS to allow these kinds of changes? What you're describing sounds like clang-tidy but perhaps with improved support for composing source modifications from fix-its, or do you envision something rather different? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
