luismarques added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/loop-alignment.ll:3-4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 -align-loops=16 | FileCheck %s 
-check-prefix=ALIGN_16
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 -align-loops=32 | FileCheck %s 
-check-prefix=ALIGN_32
+
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> jrtc27 wrote:
> > MaskRay wrote:
> > > jrtc27 wrote:
> > > > MaskRay wrote:
> > > > > luismarques wrote:
> > > > > > Nit: it's a convention of the RISC-V backend codegen tests to wrap 
> > > > > > the RUN lines.
> > > > > only 86 columns. compiler-rt is even transiting to 100 column.
> > > > compiler-rt is not the RISC-V backend :)
> > > Wrapping lines here just makes the code less readable.
> > That's your personal opinion, which I disagree with, and it's not true if 
> > your terminal isn't wide enough. Going against existing convention in the 
> > backend tests should only be done with very good reason, and personal 
> > opinion is not that.
> Lines longer than 80-column (in this case just 86) are pretty common among 
> tests. I really hope test/CodeGen/RISCV/ can be more tolerant on this matter.
> 
> Even the Linux scripts/checkpatch.pl has increased the limit to 100 because 
> in many cases wrapping lines for strict 80-conformance just harms readability.
> 
> Of course I don't want to waste time arguing on this matter. So if this turns 
> out to be an issue for RISC-V folks, I'll update it to save my time.
> Of course I don't want to waste time arguing on this matter. So if this turns 
> out to be an issue for RISC-V folks, I'll update it to save my time.

Personally, I don't particularly care. I don't know if @asb has strong feelings 
about this. If you think it would be beneficial to relax this convention please 
raise the issue on llvm-dev. Let's not keep discussing this in every patch 
touching RISC-V :-)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106701/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106701

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to