mkuper added a comment. Thanks, Simon! This looks right, but we may lose some end-to-end tests, since right now we have a clang-level test that checks the builtin is lowered to the intrinsic, and (hopefully) a CG-level test that the intrinsic is lowered to the correct instruction. Do you know if there are already CG tests that check we correctly lower these IR patterns to CVTPS2PD, etc? If not, could you add them?
================ Comment at: lib/Headers/emmintrin.h:390 @@ -390,1 +389,3 @@ + return (__m128d) __builtin_convertvector( + __builtin_shufflevector((__v4sf __a, (__v4sf)__a, 0, 1), __v2df); } ---------------- It looks like there's a missing paren after the first __v4sf. How does the test compile? Or am I misreading? Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20528 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
