bader added a subscriber: bader. bader added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20602#438667, @rsmith wrote:
> I'm not suggesting it be treated as invalid. This extension is part of at > least OpenCL 2.1, but it's not part of OpenCL 1.0. `ext_vector_type` is > Clang's implementation of the OpenCL vector type. Therefore if the user asks > us to support OpenCL 1.0, we should give them a warning if they use this > syntax. > > If we're not building an OpenCL source file, then yes, this is our extension > and it makes sense for it to be available unconditionally (without a warning). To avoid confusion, I'd like to note that rgba selector was first introduced in OpenCL C++ kernel language, which is currently in provisional state and will be part of OpenCL version 2.2. https://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/specs/opencl-2.2-cplusplus.pdf (page 18). OpenCL version 2.1 uses OpenCL C 2.0 kernel language, which doesn't support rgba selector. https://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/ - latest versions of OpenCL specs. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20602 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
