pirama added a comment. To summarize, there are two scenarios where a warning is warranted when the source language is OpenCL:
> > I'm not suggesting it be treated as invalid. This extension is part of at > > least OpenCL 2.1, but it's not part of OpenCL 1.0. `ext_vector_type` is > > Clang's implementation of the OpenCL vector type. Therefore if the user > > asks us to support OpenCL 1.0, we should give them a warning if they use > > this syntax. > - use of ext_vector_type in OpenCL 1.0 and earlier. > To avoid confusion, I'd like to note that rgba selector was first introduced > in OpenCL C++ kernel language, which is currently in provisional state and > will be part of OpenCL version 2.2. - use of rgba selector in OpenCL 2.1 and earlier. I'll look at how to add the first warning. I'll most probably upload a separate CL for this. I can easily add the second warning in this CL - to emit one on *any* OpenCL source. Alexey: can you take care of revising this warning when OpenCL2.2 is added as a langugage standard? http://reviews.llvm.org/D20602 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
