HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D95168#3099920 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168#3099920>, @owenpan wrote:
> In D95168#3099739 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168#3099739>, @MyDeveloperDay > wrote: > >> - Look further into possible Removal (I have an idea for how this might be >> possible, and super useful for LLVM where we don't like single if {} ), I'd >> like to round out on this before introducing the options rather than having >> to change them later >> >> - Should we add the possibility of removal should we change the option name >> to "AutomaticBraces" (thoughts?) > > As mentioned in D95168#3039033 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168#3039033>, I > think it would be better to handle the removal separately. The LLVM Coding > Standards has an entire section > <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-braces-on-simple-single-statement-bodies-of-if-else-loop-statements> > about this. Some of the listed exceptions/examples there can make things > more difficult. Difficult, yes. But I think it should be in one option. It hasn't to be implemented everything right from the start. And we could give all those cases a name and a different setting, so that the entire document would be mappable to a `.clang-format` with a convenience setting for all options at once. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
