nextsilicon-itay-bookstein added a comment.
> I don't know much about the ELF format... but this works today? We can
> define a resolver in a different TU and it WORKS thanks to the linker? So
> there is perhaps something?
The ifunc symbol that is emitted in the TU with the undefined resolver loses
its connection to the resolver and the calls to the ifunc are instead bound
against the resolver itself (which is absolutely not what you want).
itay> cat specific.c
#include <stdio.h>
__attribute__((cpu_specific(generic)))
void single_version(void){
puts("In single_version generic");
}
void useage() {
single_version();
}
itay> cat dispatch_main.c
void useage(void);
__attribute__((cpu_dispatch(generic)))
void single_version(void);
int main()
{
useage();
single_version();
return 0;
}
itay> clang -c dispatch_main.c -o dispatch_main.c.o
itay> clang -c specific.c -o specific.c.o
itay> clang specific.c.o dispatch_main.c.o -o main
itay> ./main
In single_version generic
This line should have been printed twice, not once.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
