ibookstein added a comment. And how is Cling expecting CFE to deal with partial knowledge situations at the implementation level? To deal with exactly the non-local cases that the current violations address? If there's no prescriptive way forward to dealing with these cases (so they're tech debt without a remediation plan), then as far as I'm concerned this case sits exactly under the same tech-debt umbrella of the existing violations and the way forward is using the same violating solution for this case too. We definitely shouldn't block the IR verification indefinitely on this impasse. Once an acceptable solution is found, this will also be part of that refactor.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
