MaskRay added a comment. In D118804#3304261 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804#3304261>, @urnathan wrote:
> While C2X has blessed such smaller alignments, the x86_64 ABI (in > particular), has not. However, using that ABI to justify 'It. Is. 16. > Bytes.', is really an exercise in reality denial at this point. just thought > I'd make it clear we have conflicting standards and practicality to attend to. By x86-64 ABI, do you mean "System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement"? I have searched a bit but do not find the relevant wording on memory allocation. If there is one, you can report issues on https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/issues (gitlab account needed). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
