urnathan added a comment. In D122119#3401322 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119#3401322>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> > I think the example is invalid since it violates [[ > http://eel.is/c++draft/module.interface#6 | [module.interface]p6 ]] > explicitly. If this is intended behavior or by design, we should change the > wording. That wording failed to be updated when the linkage-decl changes went in. I'll add a note to DR 2541. Linkage specifications, module purview, and module attachment Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
