beanz added a comment. In D128012#3592098 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012#3592098>, @Anastasia wrote:
> aha, are you having a lot of these types then? Ok that sounds similar problem > to OpenCL builtin functions as we had to go away from a simple header include > due to long parsing time. Very similar problem. We have a two-part problem where we both have enough of them that parsing a header would be too slow _and_ the HLSL language actually can't represent them. The later we're working to fix. My hope is that eventually we can write the HLSL libraries in HLSL and use a pre-compilation step (PCH or Module-style) to get past the performance issues. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
