beanz added a comment. In D128012#3598307 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012#3598307>, @Anastasia wrote:
> PCH have large in-memory size compared to the sources, but if it's not an > issue then it should be reasonable. Yea... I think we may have some flexibility on memory size. Our current on-device source->dxil compiler is a dylib that runs in the user's process. My intent for the 2.0 implementation which will based on modern clang is to move the compiler out of process, which will give us more flexibility on memory usage, especially if the memory is read-only. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
