mizvekov marked 3 inline comments as done.
mizvekov added a comment.

In D111283#3721905 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283#3721905>, @davrec wrote:

> But instead of defining it and getting into details it might be clearer, and 
> certainly would have saved me the most time, for the description to simply 
> note that this patch introduces `ASTContext::getCommonSugaredType(QualType X, 
> QualType Y, bool Unqualified = false)`, and puts it to use in type deduction 
> for binary expressions etc., and give an example or two to demonstrate.  
> (More generally on a large patch I prefer a description to give me a few 
> starting points, the primary changes which necessitate all the others.)

Done, thanks for the feedback!

> Re the patch itself: it looks good to me other than a few nits, but this has 
> such a broad and deep span (intricate details of the AST + intricate details 
> of Sema) it is difficult to give it a final thumbs up - really hoping @rsmith 
> might take a final look.  But if time runs out it is definitely worth 
> accepting as is and seeing how it goes; the benefits exceed the risks.  I 
> will try to take a close look at the other patches on your stack, but the 
> same probably applies.  You've done a tremendous amount of work here, very 
> impressive.

Yeah, but we made good progress here, thanks again!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to