reames added a comment. In D133443#3792627 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133443#3792627>, @asb wrote:
> I think the summary of our discussion on this was: > > - The versioning confusion is unfortunate - ideally there would be discussion > elsewhere at RVI on improving the situation (either ELF attributes to > indicate extensions are experimental, or making that unnecessary via never > using 1.0 until something is ratified) > - But the above isn't a blocker to merging. As the extension is gated by the > experimental flag, even if there are last minute changes the impact on users > should be minimal / non-existent. Matches my takeaway. I'm going to rebase this and add in a doc change which clearly notes the release candidate bit. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133443/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133443 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
