ychen added a comment. In D128745#3834454 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745#3834454>, @tahonermann wrote:
> Is it known what gcc and Microsoft maintainers are going to do with these > DRs? I don't see any recent changes in gcc, but the following is > interesting... It's hard to tell if they didn't implement these DRs or if they're broken. But for P2113 <https://reviews.llvm.org/P2113> (C++20) to work, DR692 is needed. > For the test below, Clang has historically accepted it but now rejects it. > MSVC has historically rejected it, but started accepting it for v19.34 > (perhaps a regression?). Gcc continues to accept it. See > https://godbolt.org/z/jax3GsYY5. > > struct map { > template <typename Sequence> > map(Sequence&& seq , void* = 0 ); > template <typename First, typename ...T_> > map(First&& first, T_&&... rest); > }; > map m(0); This should be ambiguous. Only the first parameter should be considered for partial ordering. This is basically the `g(42)` example in https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#example-4. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
