aaron.ballman added a comment. I'm also okay with this direction. I took a look to see if people seemed to be using this option in their build scripts (maybe we would need a louder deprecation period), and it seems like most of the uses out there are in forks of Clang. Once I excluded things that looked too clang-like, I spotted: https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+-file:.*test.*+-file:.*clang.*+-file:Tools.cpp+-menable-unsafe-fp-math&patternType=standard -- I don't have the impression we need a deprecation period for this. (Do we consider this to be a potentially breaking change we need to list in the release notes/announcements/clang-vendors?) The changes should have a release note, regardless of what heading we put it under.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135097/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135097 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
