vmiklos added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814#492540, @omtcyfz wrote:
> I'd be actually happy if instead of having `-rename-at` option we'd have this > behavior by default unless `-rename-all` is used. Not sure I understand this request. rename-at and rename-all all subcommands, not options. "have this by default", you mean the ability to perform multiple oldname->newname replacements with one commandline invocation? If so, not allowing that when the rename-all subcommand is chosen sounds confusing to me. But perhaps I misunderstand something. ;-) I can make the rename-at subcommand optional, and when not specifying a subcommand, assume rename-at was specified (unless -help or -version is used). Is this what you want? https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
