awarzynski added a comment. In D129156#3848704 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129156#3848704>, @clementval wrote:
>>> I still cannot reproduce the build failure on my end. @MatsPetersson tested >>> this patch and the tests passed. >> >> @MatsPetersson & @clementval , could you share you build command so that the >> failure can be reproduced before this re-lands? > > I shared it with @tarunprabhu and I think the only major difference is the > use of Ninja vs. Unix Makefiles. > > cmake \ > -G "Unix Makefiles" \ > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ > -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON \ > -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=host \ > -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;mlir;flang" \ > -DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES="compiler-rt" Thanks Valentin! Switching between generators will definitely change the order in which libraries will built (and, AFAIK, the order is non-deterministic to begin with). I will try to experiment later today. If anyone manages to test this in the meantime, please share here - that's part of the public review process :) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129156/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129156 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
