hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. > I reached out to the GCC author to confirm that the committee acknowledges > that there should be a change to temp.func.order p6.2.1, but no consensus on > what changes to make [3].
A more accurate description is that some changes elsewhere to overload resolution are probably needed, but no solution has been developed sufficiently. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
