ychen added a comment. In D128750#3854675 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750#3854675>, @hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
>> I reached out to the GCC author to confirm that the committee acknowledges >> that there should be a change to temp.func.order p6.2.1, but no consensus on >> what changes to make [3]. > > A more accurate description is that some changes elsewhere to overload > resolution are probably needed, but no solution has been developed > sufficiently. I've updated the patch description. Thanks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
