probinson added a comment. In D138597#3957356 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597#3957356>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D138597#3954269 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597#3954269>, @probinson > wrote: > >> The codes have been allocated but AFAICT the website doesn't have the new >> codes listed (I looked at >> http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.php/DWARF_Language_Support which doesn't even >> have all the v5 codes yet). > > I think they're up here: https://dwarfstd.org/Languages.php (linked from the > dwarfstd.org front page "DWARF V5 Language Codes and Requests") Oh, thanks. I had it in my head they were on the wiki, but being on the main site is better. >> @aprantl do you have an opinion on this? I tend to lean to the pedantic >> side on this kind of thing, but I'm persuadable. > > Yeah, I've certainly got mixed feelings - maybe we don't pick up these > after-release language codes, and instead produce the new language encoding > (which separates language from version) as an extension, alongside the > old/in-the-dwarfv5-spec-document codes? So that a DWARFv5 consumer that > contains only the DWARFv5-spec-document functionality and not the new codes, > and a newer consumer can read the new parts. Except the new LNAME codes aren't 1-1 with the old codes and aren't published anywhere. Well, except in the issue resolution, I guess, but that's not definitive (subject to change until DWARF 6 is published). I'm not sure which way to go here. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
