probinson added a comment. One not-yet-asked question, does gcc produce the C++17/20 codes? If so, does fstrict-dwarf affect that? The major consumers of this would be lldb (which we control) and gdb, so following gcc's lead here would seem appropriate. I can accept that listing the codes on the website "counts" as in-spec for fstrict-dwarf purposes.
Deferring the v6 language attributes seems totally fair. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
