kadircet added a subscriber: VitaNuo. kadircet added a comment. thanks a lot for the patch, we're already having some efforts right now to improve our cppreference parsing and get to a more complete set of symbols (@VitaNuo for visibility, who drives these efforts).
Regarding the experimental symbols, first of all I am not sure if it's a good idea to include them in clangd (or other clang-tools) at all. As a clang-tool binary can stay around for years (e.g. people can use 3 years old clangd) and symbols under `std::experimental` are subject to change throughout that period, hence the information provided is going to be vastly different than what the truth is in that time window (also i don't know if they'll be "same" across libc++ vs libstdc++ implementations). In addition to that, AFAICT there's no great index page to parse for technical-specs hence we might indeed be forced to manually curate these symbols and that's something we've been trying to avoid due to maintenance costs. In the case of technical-specs this cost will increase, because they're subject to change a lot more frequent than regular std symbols and value is even less as these are not used by majority of the developers. So I am afraid this is not some extra complexity we can take in. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142836/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142836 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
