PiotrZSL added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp:55
+ AvoidByValueCaptureDefaultWhenCapturingThisCheck>(
+
"cppcoreguidelines-avoid-by-value-capture-default-when-capturing-this");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck>(
----------------
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> PiotrZSL wrote:
> > carlosgalvezp wrote:
> > > PiotrZSL wrote:
> > > > PiotrZSL wrote:
> > > > > this name is hard to understand
> > > > >
> > > > > I asked ChatGPT about it, and here are some other proposals:
> > > > >
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-by-value-default-this-capture
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-this-capture-by-value-default
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-explicit-this-capture-by-value
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-implicit-this-capture-by-value
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-implicit-by-value-this-capture
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-prefer-explicit-this-capture
> > > > > - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-ambiguous-this-capture
> > > > Probably something like this would be good:
> > > > cppcoreguidelines-avoid-implicit-this-capture-by-value
> > > Nice suggestions! I've done a bit of mix of them, let me know if you are
> > > happy with it.
> > To be honest that "default" sounds strange. Simply I check name does not
> > read as an "sentence", more as bunch of words, but I'm fine with this.
> I agree, I'm not very happy either. We had quite a lot of discussion in the
> original patch about this. The problem is that the Standard calls it "capture
> default" which doesn't read like an English sentence (should be "default
> capture"). But it seems "capture default" is a widely used term out there and
> in the repo, so that's why we went for that.
>
> What about the following?
>
> - cppcoreguidelines-ambiguous-capture-default-by-value
> - cppcoreguidelines-ambiguous-by-value-capture-default
GPT: "Both of these names convey the intended meaning, but the latter option,
cppcoreguidelines-ambiguous-capture-default-by-value, is slightly clearer and
more readable. It emphasizes that the ambiguity is related to the
"capture-default" and its "by-value" aspect. This makes it easier for someone
to understand the rule's purpose at a glance."
ME: "is word ambiguous correct here ?"
GPT: "The word "ambiguous" may not be the most accurate term to describe the
issue in this context. A better term might be "misleading" since the behavior
of by-value capture-defaults in member functions can lead to confusion or
incorrect assumptions about how data members are captured.
Thus, a more appropriate name for the guideline could be
cppcoreguidelines-misleading-capture-default-by-value. This name highlights
that the capture-default by value can be misleading in terms of how data
members are captured within member functions."
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148340/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148340
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
