joshua-arch1 added a comment. I'm wondering whether it is appropriate to just use FPR16 for the destination of fcvt.bf16.s? The destination is in BF16 format instead of simple FP16. Your implemention looks like just replacing fcvt.h.s with fcvt.bf16.s. Do we need to define a new register class?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147610/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147610 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
