arsenm added a comment. In D156816#4551409 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816#4551409>, @Anastasia wrote:
> Why not to just use target address space and define it to some macro with > desirable spelling? If you mean the numbered address spaces, that's the broken thing this is specifically trying to disallow. We probably shouldn't even allow you to use those numbers. The numbered versions are not treated equivalently, and don't have the same enforced semantic rules. For example __constant__ disallows storing to it, but address_space(4) does. The lack of casting rules is also an issue Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
