jhuber6 added a comment. In D156816#4551409 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816#4551409>, @Anastasia wrote:
> Why not to just use target address space and define it to some macro with > desirable spelling? > > I don't think renaming OpenCL address space to something else makes sense. It > might make more sense to just introduced different model of address spaces > completely. But if you use OpenCL ones then it makes sense to have adequate > naming so its documentation and etc can be located. My issue is that these address spaces aren't really OpenCL specific, they describe a larger concept than the OpenCL language itself and we'd like to use that without needing to invoke the `opencl` name, since it's unrelated in this context. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156816 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
