asl wrote: > Out of curiousity, why don't we have the problem in the normal return > continuation ABI?
The problem happens when the value is directly used in `coro.end` intrinsic. For example, when we're forwarding coroutine argument as a result. Or, when the value itself is computed before the suspend. Everything else is correctly handled by the present code due to BB split (the corresponding instructions appear in `Cleanup` block for example and correctly spilled). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66333 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
