ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > Out of curiousity, why don't we have the problem in the normal return > > continuation ABI? > > The problem happens when the value is directly used in `coro.end` intrinsic. > For example, when we're forwarding coroutine argument as a result. Or, when > the value itself is computed before the suspend. Everything else is correctly > handled by the present code due to BB split (the corresponding instructions > appear in `Cleanup` block for example and correctly spilled).
I still don't understand the motivation fully. Do you say we don't have the problem naturally? Or could you show some motivation examples? (In LLVM IR?) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66333 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
