weliveindetail wrote: > I don't really know more about the issue that requires --long-plt at the > moment and why it's only needed for clang-repl
clang-repl binary size is ~3.7G in debug mode and this seems to exceed the branch range of default ARM PLT slots. The instruction sequence that's necessary for long-range PLT slots is likely more expensive. I guess this situation is too much of an edge-case to make the effort and detect it upfront, so they just bail out if it happens an ask for the flag. > If you'd want it to hit more universally, perhaps just remove the > architecture check - if we test that the linker does support `--long-plt` > without erroring out, we probably can add it, even if we don't really know > the exact architecture we're linking for? Yes, that sounds like the better option. We give it a try later today. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78959 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
