mstorsjo wrote: > > I don't really know more about the issue that requires --long-plt at the > > moment and why it's only needed for clang-repl > > clang-repl binary size is ~3.7G in debug mode and this seems to exceed the > branch range of default ARM PLT slots. The instruction sequence that's > necessary for long-range PLT slots is likely more expensive. I guess this > situation is too much of an edge-case to make the effort and detect it > upfront, so they just bail out if it happens an ask for the flag.
Right, I see. Though - why is this only an issue for the clang-repl binary and not the other clang-based ones? Does it happen to hit some maximum when it uses both everything that is in normal clang, plus all the JIT stuff? (Normally I would expect LLDB to be the largest one, as it includes much of Clang, but that's also always split into a separate liblldb.so.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78959 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
